Over the weekend I was talking to some people about how we might increase the number of women in philosophy. The sad truth is that there still are only around 20 percent women in philosophy jobs. But as has been pointed out numerous times, the problem starts at the undergraduate level. If we could get more women to major in philosophy, there would be a greater pool of female applicants for PhD programs to choose from and more women to hire in tenure-track positions.

Of course, there is a super-simple solution to this problem. Hire more women in TT positions to serve as role models for undergraduate students. Problem: Vicious circle. There aren't enough women to hire. The star programs snap up most of the women on the market. That makes it difficult for less well ranked programs to find women to hire. Or so I am told.

I hasten to say that I don’t believe this is the full extent of the problem. I am quite sure that a man is sometimes chosen over an equally qualified woman for a PhD scholarship or a TT job. But I am going to set that aside here in order to focus on what we might do to attract more women and keep the women already in philosophy happy. Most of this has been said before but I don’t think it will hurt to repeat it.

  1. Most of us women are completely turned off by too much male testosterone. So, put an end to the aggressiveness.  Stop pretending you are a literary critic from New York Times. You can ask your questions in a kind and respectful way. It doesn’t decrease the quality of your question. Au contraire. There is nothing better than a sharp comment or devastating counterexample presented in a sympathetic and considerate manner.
  2. Stop treating us like sex objects. We know you usually can’t help it. It’s automatic, a product of evolution. But you can control it if you think hard enough about it. So, stop staring at our breasts when you talk to us. Stop discussing our butts when you think we can’t hear you. Treat us in a gender-neutral way.  We are not women or men when we do philosophy. We are just philosophers.
  3. Young women sometimes tell me that they don’t have anyone to socialize with at APA meetings because everyone already has made plans with their old buddies. The old boys’ clubs are meeting in the bar, making themselves available for a little chit-chat with others, but then around dinnertime they split. When you arrange your dinners and get-togethers (we know that’s why you go to these meetings), include some women. Ask your buddies if they know any women going to the meeting. Then email them and ask them to come out with you to your gatherings. Acting like you are part of an old boys’ club is soooo uncool anyway.
  4. When you are attending a talk or graduate seminar and a woman is asking a question, you might feel that she is going on and on and on. Stop that thought right away. It’s just something you feel. There are studies showing that we perceive women’s questions as longer and more tedious than men’s, even when they ask the very same question! So, let the woman speak, make sure she gets plenty of follow-ups, and if you think her question is 8 minutes long, divide that by 2.
  5. Don’t judge a woman’s talk or class presentation harshly because she is a little nervous. It is well known that more women suffer from anxiety than men. That includes social anxiety and fear of public speaking. Perhaps it is estrogen-related. We don’t really know. But it can be debilitating. So, when you see a woman give a talk that does not seem quite as professional as the talk by the man before her, cut her some slack. Focus on the content and the structure of the talk, not on the style of presentation.
  6. When you talk to a group of philosophers that includes both women and men, make sure that you are not just looking at the men. Men have an annoying tendency to ignore women when other men are present. It’s really uncomfortable for the women in the group, and it’s even worse if the group consists of just one woman and her male buddy. REALLY uncomfortable! Trust me. So, divide your attention evenly.
  7. When you teach lower-level undergraduate courses, make sure that you include a lot of literature written by women. That can be inspirational for young women. They might just think, “If she could do this, so can I.” Give the students a little background about the authors. Tell them about the women they are reading: where they work, what they specialize in, which other work they have completed. Make them come alive for your students.
  8. Finally, a piece of advice for women only. All you women out there, apply to this workshop:

 

Call for Submissions

 

A Networking and Mentoring Workshop 
for Graduate Student Women in Philosophy

 

www.princeton.edu/~mentorship

 

Co-Directors: Elisabeth Camp, Elizabeth Harman, and Jill North

 

Female PhD and DPhil students and prospective students in philosophy are invited to submit papers on any topic in philosophy to participate in a workshop at Princeton University, August 21-24, 2014.

Thirty-five students will be selected to participate. Seven students will have their papers discussed; fourteen students will serve as commentators, and fourteen as chairs. In addition to the seven philosophy sessions, there will be five sessions at which professional advice is offered by twelve faculty mentors.

The workshop will provide meals and shared rooms for three nights at the Nassau Inn for all participants. The workshop will reimburse up to $400 of travel costs. Participants traveling with children will be provided with a single room rather than a shared room.  The workshop will also provide information about how to find babysitters in the Princeton area.

We are committed to accommodating all participants with disabilities.

Mentors:

Karen Bennett, Cornell University 

Elisabeth Camp, Rutgers University

Ruth Chang, Rutgers University

Elizabeth Harman, Princeton University

Jennifer Lackey, Northwestern University

Sarah-Jane Leslie, Princeton University

Ishani Maitra, University of Michigan

Jill North, Cornell University

Debra Satz, Stanford University

Jennifer Uleman, Purchase College, State University of New York

Katja Vogt, Columbia University

Susan Wolf, University of North Carolina

 

Advice Topics:

            Getting the most out of graduate school

            Writing a dissertation  

            Publishing

            Presenting and participating at conferences

            Teaching

            Preparing for the job market

            Starting a tenure-track job

            Balancing work with the rest of life

 

Papers on any topic in philosophy are welcome. Submissions must be no longer than 7,000 words, including notes and references, and must be prepared for anonymous review. The submission deadline is March 1, 2014. We will notify all applicants of our decision by the end of May 2014.

The online submission form is linked from the workshop webpage: 

www.princeton.edu/~mentorship

This is the first in a series of three workshops that will occur biennially.  These three workshops will reach more than 100 graduate student women across five years.

Workshop Sponsors:

Cornell University Sage School of Philosophy

The Marc Sanders Foundation

Princeton University Center for Human Values

Princeton University Department of Philosophy

Princeton University Council of the Humanities

Princeton University Diversity Initiative

Rutgers University Department of Philosophy

Posted in ,

103 responses to “How do we get more women into philosophy (And a workshop)”

  1. Berit Brogaard Avatar

    Yes, I think the book Whipping Girl (recommended by Rachel above) makes that exceedingly clear. Julia Serano (the author) is saying that the sex/gender assigned to her at birth was wrong for her. That’s how she felt. She is very much against the term “transgender” as describing her identity, as that expression is too broad and vague (according to her). She prefers the term “transsexual”. She feels that the main problem in today’s society is that femininity is offensive and ridiculed, regardless of which body it is instantiated in, but it’s even more offensive to cis people (she says) when it’s instantiated in a body that was assigned the male sex/gender at birth.

    Like

  2. Rachel Avatar
    Rachel

    I can’t believe I’m even bothering: many trans people find “transsexual” deeply offensive, but not “trans” or “transgender.” Serano has her reasons, others of us have our own.
    For fuck’s sake, just use “trans” or “trans*”. They’re safest right now.
    Here’s what pisses me off: you people just want to be told what to do. You don’t want to understand the underlying reasons or issues behind why some people prefer one thing, while others strongly disprefer it. If you started to understand the underlying reasons, you wouldn’t need to be told what to do. You’d grasp the complexity and likely figure your own way to navigate the terrain.

    Like

  3. Rachel Avatar
    Rachel

    “If gender roles are purely social then we would have to say that the non-cisgendered are all this way because of parenting. This is the kind of thing Freudians used to say to gay people (caused by bad mothering for gay men), and I think it’s just as cruel and wrongheaded today with respect to non-cisgendered. Moreover, there is strong growing evidence of genetic and/or epigenetic factors independent of culture inputs resulting in gender dysphoria.”
    You just conflated gender identity with gender roles.

    Like

Leave a reply to plus.google.com/115616621561471088402 Cancel reply