The University of Florida has been given permission to hire "100 faculty members to fill new positions it will create as part of a push to join the nation’s top 10 public research institutions," The Chronicle reports. [HT Pete Boettke] According to the university, the main fields targeted for expansion "are life sciences, massive data,  cybersecurity, Latin American development." Given demographics and geography, the first and last of these priorities make eminent sense, of course. (I ignore here the non-trivial issue to what degree Florida should be investing in higher education rather than, say, in K1-12.)

Now, earlier in the year this very same university made national headlines by acknowledging that it is basically terminating its PhD program in economics. Given that "massive" data-mining is increasingly taking over economics, there is some logic in this decision (recall and here, here).  But before any philosopher has misplaced schadenfreude over the demise of the once-imperial human science in the face of market-forces, it is worth noting that the economics  department was "offered the opportunity to move to the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences but opted to remain within the business college and become smaller." One wonders what is known about the investment priorities of the Gator's college of LAS.  For more on the internal political economy at UF  called "responsibility-centered management", see here.

Posted in , ,

4 responses to “On UF’s Investment priorities”

  1. Matt Lister Avatar

    Of course, UF eliminated its PhD program in philosophy several years ago, while even then mouthing its “goal” to be a “to 10 public research institution”.
    http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2008/05/budget-cuts-res.html
    It’s the sort of thing that makes one wonder if the people saying this sort of stuff believe it, but are just fools, or if they are con-men.

    Like

  2. Eric Schliesser Avatar

    Good point. Of course, they may just mean that to be a “top 10 public research institution” just is to be in the top 10 institutions obtaining federal grant money.

    Like

  3. Jon Cogburn Avatar
    Jon Cogburn

    Grants which can be shaved off to cover the price of administrative bloat, even as tuition from humanities departments subsidizes the net monetary loss to the institution. So definitely con men in Lister’s typology (but perhaps fools as well).

    Like

  4. Eric Schliesser Avatar

    If you follow the links in my post, you’ll see that the economics undergraduate major had grown quite a bit before this decision was taken. So that probably fits your analysis.

    Like

Leave a reply to Jon Cogburn Cancel reply