The biggest failing in my generation is the inconstancy of our affections, driven by an inconsistent mix of ironic detachment and fear of being uncool. 

Think of poor hair bands like RATT, on tour in 1991. In the exact same weeks as Nirvana's "Smells Like Teen Spirit" starts its relentless climb up the charts RATT suddenly finds themselves playing to stadiums that are not even half full. Gen Xers' affections are so inconstant that poor RATT went from the Beatles to Spinal Tap in two weeks.

And then when grunge did get over almost everybody was too scared to really be fans. What if these Nirvana guys end up like RATT?* Far better to mark an arbitrary point where the band "sold out" and claim to only like stuff before that (for Nirana fans Bleach and the material later released on Incesticide, for Soundgarden fans everything before Superunknown, for Nine Inch Nails fans everything before Downward Spiral, for REM fans everything before Warner Brothers debut Green, etc. etc. etc.). 

Punk was in part supposed to be about freeing oneself from the hegemony of cool. Grunge was supposed to be a return to this, but it wrecked itself on the shores of a generation embodied by the content-free irony that characterized the television show Seinfeld (laugh track and all) at its best. Irony becomes not the appropriate response to certain aspects of life, but rather a detached way of engaging with everything.


As grunge itself shipwrecked for various reasons it got swept away by the tides of a music that openly celebrated frat boy ressentiment at its worst (Limp Biscuit, etc.).*** The White Stripes era was a sort of last ditch effort to hold the line before Clear Channel, MTV, political paralysis and other harbingers of civilizational hopelessness made it completely unimportant what kind of "music" is popular.  Today almost all of it is melody-free aural wallpaper, leavened with Miley Cyrus type pseudo-outrage and minstrel show regurgitations of past moments when record company profits actually sometimes exerted selective pressure in favor of music with actual melodies (pity the poor unemployed "A&R man," whose services in general are no longer needed).

Now one of the things that interests me is that how the internet rose just as grunge was failing as a popular aesthetic moment. And while there are many compelling sociological explanations of why people are so much more rude and uncharitable on the internet than they are face to face (Q&A after philosophy presentations notwithstanding), I think part of the explanation is that Seinfeldian irony just went through grunge types and onto the interwebs to metastasize.

What Graham Harman calls the internet "sneer from nowhere" just is the hipster who can't really be a fan of anything because of the crippling fear of being uncool. In philosophy debates this leads to a kind of hyper-critical engagement where everyone trying to say something substantive has to satisfy Cartesian level demands for justification, but the critic doesn't because the critic has figured out how to be too cool to get into any such entanglements. Thus is born, in Ray Brassier's words, "an orgy of on-line stupidity," though the double standard faced by the critical and post-critical philosopher surely effects proper publication as well.

Luckily, in the musical realm, you still get just enough non-hipsters who are aspie-like in their devotions. Like Philip Larkin's bicyclist walking through the empty church, something is thus kept alive. For example, I had a female student last year who could go on and on about every aspect of The Runaways. For an hour in my office one day she shared her theories about just exactly how Joan Jett was influenced by Suzie Quatro. There was no ironic detachment at all, just this passion for the oevre. It gave me hope.

If one wanted to be unfair, one would say that (for better and worse) analytic philosophers have perfected the sneer from nowhere and continental philosophers have perfected the art of being a fan. While there is something to this, there are obviously important counterexamples, and for that matter maybe Carl Sachs is right and there will soon be enough overlap to render the point moot.**** I don't know, but like Larkin's meditations on what happens to churchs once we give up superstition, I sometimes wonder what would happen to philosophy if (for example) some particularly virulant on-going permutation of positivism/phenomenology wins, and nobody is willing to potentially embarass themselves by offering up substantive truths about the world.***** Luckily, we are nowhere near the Larkin tipping point, and I can't help but hope that the uncool millenials will do better than my generation both with respect to music and philosophy.******

[Notes:

*They did. RATT rhythm guitarist Robin Crosby died of a heroin overdose on June 6, 2002. I often look for actuarial research on what jobs are the most dangerous. Unfortunately none of the surveys include "member of a rock band" as a category, but I think it's probably as bad or worse than the usual suspects (lumberjack, commercial fisherman, and roustabout). Part of why this is so depressing is that rock music mortality seems to go up the more successful the musician is. I don't think that anything like this holds for lumberjacks.**

**Who as we all know, work all night and sleep all day.

***A dear friend of mine knew it was all over when he had gone to a fraternity party for the free booze in college. In their back yard the frat boys had an elaborate set up of beer bottles that all together quoted  the Maoist rap rock outfit Rage Against the Machine's lyric "Fuck you, I won't do what you told me," because apparently "the man" is keeping us down whenever he investigates our chapter for the latest round of hazing, academic dishonesty, and/or date rape.  The Rage Against the Machine album played for the entire hour that my friend allocated to cleaning out the liquor cabinet. He never once said, "Dude. You are the machine." It was too hopeless, and the rise of the Fred Durst era proved him right.

Incidentally, Kurt Cobain once said something to the effect that his best friend at concerts were the spotlights because they prevented him from seeing all of the people in the audience who would have beaten him up in high school. And I once had a diabetic friend who danced in a strip club to pay for her medications. Like Cobain, this was only possible for her because she had contact lenses she could take out before going on stage.

****I'm 2/3ds sympathetic to this. The danger is that we end up saying that because we have California Heideggerians now the people involved with SPEP should just shut up and get back to work.

*****Am just finishing a paper with Neal Hebert on levels of aesthetic distance in professional wrestling. There are actually strong homologies between different types of wrestling fandom and the following: naive realist, skeptic, post-skeptic metaphysician, positivist/phenomenologist, post-modern metaphysician. We're probably going to leave this out of the paper, so I'll do a post in the next week or so. It's much more interesting than the above early morning meditations.

******Please read Jennifer Egan's beautiful novel A Visit from the Goon Squad for some evidence of how this might be happening. I think there is a little bit of techno-fetishism at the end with how crowd-sourcing will replace the traditional A&R thing, but the concert itself and the little boy obsessed with musical stops are beautifully rendered and get something right about those among us who might unironically assert "Rock is dead. Long live rock." Was it Richard Rorty who said that philosophy buries its own undertakers?]

Posted in

9 responses to “We are the goon squad and we’re coming to town. Beep-beep. Beep-beep.”

  1. Tim O'Keefe Avatar

    Small correction: Limp Bizkit.

    Like

  2. Jon Cogburn Avatar
    Jon Cogburn

    This reminds me of a great moment while watching professional wrestling in a small arena in Hattiesburg Mississippi (traveling to different states to watch wrestling being the kind of thing one does before children).
    In JBL’s fantastic heel promo he kept mispronouncing the town as hate-ees-burg. The crowd got so incensed that they all started chanting “hat-tees-burg! hat-tees-burg!” over and over again. JBL was silenced and just sneered for a while. When the crowd had finally stopped, JBL said, “Well, you might be able to pronounce it, but given the educational system of this state you sure can’t spell it.”
    I honestly don’t know who is homologous to the long suffering denizens of Hattiesburg here, Fred Durst or people who misremember it as being “Limp Biscuit”.

    Like

  3. Tim O'Keefe Avatar

    Not sure what maps onto what, but nice anecdote. Knowing almost nothing about pro wrestling, I went ahead and just googled “JBL Heel” and came across the following bit he wrote on how to be a bad guy in pro wrestling:
    “However, heat-in promos-is never the oversimplified, “you suck.” Fans will boo like parrots after that, but that is not real heat. Heat in promos has to make people think and be smart enough to make them hate you. To do that you have to make real points, but embellished of course.
    When I started JBL I literally took a speech from Pat Buchanan, the conservative commentator. I saw him and saw what kind of response he got from the media about his comments- and I took it almost word for word what he said about immigrants when I was trying to get heat working with Eddie. I took a real person’s feelings and attitude and put them into a promo. To me that is the essence of being a heel.”
    Anyway, back to work.

    Like

  4. Jon Cogburn Avatar
    Jon Cogburn

    Oh man thanks, that’s such a great interview. My wife was actually wearing a JBL shirt at the Hattiesburg show and after the match JBL wouldn’t say hello or even look at us. He so purely kept kayfabe that it just made us bigger fans (of the performer, not the character).
    It was a great show because Ray Mysterio’s truck hadn’t made it. As a result, they had to doublebook JBL, Big Show (when he was a face, which he is much better as), and Eddie Guerrero. A lot of matches had to be improvised on the fly, and to see Guerrero do some old standbys was wonderful.
    In his non-scripted match with Big Show, he did the great bit where he hits the ref with a chair, the ref falls down and then Eddie tosses the chair to big show and falls down himself. He looks up at the crowd and winks. Then the confused ref gets up and sees Big Show holding the chair and Eddie on the ground, and immediately declares Eddie the winner by technical default. It was a perfectly executed old style heel victory.
    “Smart fans” are fans who do separate out performer and character and allow that guide their aesthetic responses (the “real” contest among wrestlers is the extent to which the performer (either as face or heel) can get over with the fans). JBL’s comments about not trying to do too much working of the smart fans is really interesting in this context.
    After reading the essay, I think that John Cena is actually a brilliant work on smart fans. For many smart fans he’s functioned as a heel in exactly the way JBL characterizes heels! And of course he has consistently been the kids’ favorite babyface for over a decade now.
    But something weird is happening with Cena. Just as every smart fan ends up kind of rooting for some heels as characters (because they root for the performers to get over so much and it bleeds into judgments about the narrative itself), smart fans are starting to come around on Cena, because he’s been such a great heel for us for so long. So now you have this incredibly saccharine babyface who has built grudging respect among smart fans. It’s a strange development.

    Like

  5. APS Avatar
    APS

    So is this what OOO does now? They just write posts about how they are unfairly maligned and treated poorly while their major figures go around accusing people of anti-semitism? Neat. Really makes me want to take you guys seriously.

    Like

  6. Jon Cogburn Avatar
    Jon Cogburn

    I can’t speak for anyone else, but yes this is all I do now.*
    The rest of the time I am kept in a hyperbaric chamber like the poor crew in Kubrik’s 2001 A Space Odyssey. Most people don’t know this, but you don’t even dream when you are in one of those things, and I wouldn’t describe the nearly imperceptible, slow, slow beat of my heart while in a stasis field as really “doing” anything.
    They do let me out each morning to write posts about how I am unfairly maligned and treated poorly though. So there’s that at least.
    [Notes:
    *And you know who else had “major figures”? THE NAZIS. Your anti-semitism disgusts me. Why don’t you just take it up with Mel Gibson’s father or something. Christ.]

    Like

  7. Carl Sachs Avatar

    I wouldn’t say that my hope is that there will be enough “overlap” so as to undermine the analytic/Continental divide. Rather, my hope is that the very idea of a divide will be dissolved by embracing methodological pluralism about professional philosophy. (“Pluralism” is what pragmatists call “multiplicity”.)
    As I see it — here I’m thinking about Friedman’s A Parting of the Ways and also Abraham Stone’s outstanding paper on Carnap’s criticism of Heidegger — both Heidegger and Carnap function as the founding figures of Continental and analytic philosophy by excluding whatever is not “genuine philosophy” — as not being “scientific” (Carnap) or as not really “thinking” (Heidegger). If we can appreciate methodological pluralism — that both Carnap and Heidegger are themselves but two options among many — then we won’t be in the grip of “the analytic/Continental divide”.
    Now, one result of that pluralism will be all sorts of new and interesting hybrids, like analytic neo-Hegelianism and Continental realism. Lately as I find more and more interesting material in the Continental realists that looks like the metaphysical side of Peirce, Dewey, and Lewis — which the analytic pragmatists dispensed with, in keeping with their Carnapian scorn towards metaphysics — I’ve been toying with the notion of a ‘speculative pragmatism’ (not directly connected with Rosenthal’s book of the same title, though). But the hybridization is a consequence of the pluralism, and it’s the pluralism that I’m hoping for, not a “melting pot”.

    Like

  8. Jon Cogburn Avatar
    Jon Cogburn

    Ooh this is nice. I very much like the way you characterize pluralism and think that it really does guard against the tendency I worry about when some people talk of getting past the divide.
    Have you seen Robert Stern’s new book Hegelian Metaphysics? Chapters 7-11 all concern American Pragmatists. I’d love to be a fly on the wall watching a conversation between you and Stern. I haven’t made it to Chapter 7 yet, but his earlier treatment of British Hegelians is really wonderful. This semester I’m doing Stern’s guidebook to Hegel’s Phenomenology (I think the best such book from those I’ve dipped into) and will finish up the newer one over the summer.

    Like

  9. Carl Sachs Avatar

    I won’t pretend to claim how interesting a conversation between me and Stern would be, seeing as how I’m still a very junior scholar. But I’ll definitely read his book!
    (For one thing, it should give me some further historical context for understanding why C. I. Lewis and Sellars both thought that positing a difference between perception and judgment was supposed to halt the slippery slope to “idealism,” and why it would be a good thing to do so.)

    Like

Leave a reply to Carl Sachs Cancel reply