Bob Dylan is often the worst interpreter of his own songs. Not because of the old saw that his voice is bad (it's not). Rather, the songs themselves often combine the angry and the elegiac, but when Dylan does his own songs there's often a kind of sneering quality and so you don't hear the elegiac. More generally, the best covers of his songs are almost in dialogue with Dylan, discovering aspects of them that are not prominent in his versions. The songs themselves are so rich that these facets are waiting there to be uncovered.* Consider for example, Bryan Ferry's cover of "Don't Think Twice," at right.

Unlike Dylan's (or Johnny Cash's version, for that matter)** there's just absolutely nothing sneering about it, and the melody and sentiment*** becomes even more universal, expressing what a drag it is when things have gone so comperehensively bollocks up that a friendship ends, and also what is sometimes the correct response. The narrator starts by simply blaming his friend ("You're the reason"), but (especially in Ferry's performance) can't really sustain this reaction even though he tries throughout. And its clear that the dawning realization of his own complicity doesn't really change anything. All he can do is evict himself from his friend's life, sadness slowly crowding out the anger.


[Notes:

*Compare to the Beatles, who are almost impossible to cover. I wish I had more insight into why Dylan and the Beatles are at such opposite ends in this regard. The simple answer is that the Beatles' melodies are typically a whole lot more complicated. But this isn't quite right, because even simple three chord songs like "Why Don't we Do it in the Road" lose almost everything when you cover them. Somehow the Beatles' own versions of their songs are so canonical that most covers just sound like bad imitations or incompetent experimentation.****

**The absolute nadir, sneerwise, of Cash covering Dylan is it ain't me. Like so much else with Cash, June Carter ended up savings things. The anger assumes a comedic aspect, completely clear in the live performance to which I've linked. His pronunciation of "babe" is completely different than on the recorded version, less clipped and condescending, and note how June Carter says "the words" at 2:18 right after Cash sings "someone who knows" and before he sings "your heart." Ha!

Of course when the anger is turned inward Cash beats Dylan at his own material. Consider his wonderful cover of One Too Many Mornings, which paved the way for the cover of Kris Kristopherson's Sunday Morning Coming Down, five years later, which so many great country songs have descended from (e.g. Roger Allan Wade's funny send-up If You're Going to be Dumb).

***I realize I might have this wrong a little bit, even with respect to Ferry's performance. Melody and expression speak much more to me than lyrics. But for some people, the words are by far the most important thing, so much so that rock music is really a species of poetry for them. The best rock critics, like Greil Marcus, have brilliant things to say about how lyrics, melody, and expressive aspects of the performance play off against one another.

****Joe Cocker's A Little Help From my Friends is of course an exception, where he actually manages to get the suit to fit himself and it's something to behold. Los Lobos' Tomorrow Never Knows is beyond excellent, but like so many Beatles covers you are left wondering why not just listen to the original. Nothing new is really added. The third level is the most common, where the cover is demonstrably worse. Even a walking divinity like Stevie Wonder ends up being underwhelming (e.g. his version of We Can Work it Out).]

Posted in

5 responses to “Bryan Ferry (orig. Robert Zimmerman) – Don’t Think Twice”

  1. Justin Avatar
    Justin

    The Beatles didn’t just write collections of songs, they really did compose albums. Side 2 of Abbey Road is the most clear case of this, but the idea that you could competently cover one of their post-Rubber Soul songs completely divorced from their context is, in most cases, silly. You’re right that Cocker’s the exception, but I’m tempted to just chalk that up to “Billy Shear’s” wan vocals. I also do think that their individual songs are, by and large, quite complicated (especially compared to most rock). No doubt, there are exceptions like “Why Don’t We Do It In the Road?” but the reason it’s hard to cover that song well is that Paul’s vocal on that one is just really stellar. Like “Got to Get You Into My Life” (which incidentally, might be the perfect pop song and has never been covered well) or “Golden Slumbers” good.
    Dylan’s own performance of his songs has always struck me as, not unlike a tortilla chip, primarily a delivery vehicle for something delicious (I guess in this analogy, the song itself is the guac). I found it really interesting the first time I saw him that when he did “All Along the Watchtower” he really did just cover Hendrix’s version of it. I guess he agreed with what Reznor said after Cash’s covered “Hurt,” which was just that sometimes other folks get the song better than the writer does. Maybe that’s the start of an argument that works of art are abstract objects that are discovered and not things that are created (kidding…).

    Like

  2. Dennis Kavlakoglu Avatar
    Dennis Kavlakoglu

    I submit for your consideration (just in case you hadn’t heard it or had forgotten about it):
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqISzRFzDyE
    Very different version from Clapton. But I think it makes a nice blues song.

    Like

  3. Jon Cogburn Avatar
    Jon Cogburn

    I think you are right about the two other reasons it is so hard to cover a Beatles song. So we have: (1) given how incredibly catchy the melodies are, the songs are actually vastly more complicated in terms of harmonic progression (there used to be debates among musicologists about whether even their very early stuff could have been written by people with their level of musical education), (2) from Rubber Soul onward, they were definitely writing albums, not just individual songs, and covers lose by having the songs taken out of context, and (3) given their songwriting ability, people tend to underwrite the supernatural performance abilities they honed playing all night gigs for two years in Hamburg. On this latter one, I’ve been watching the Shea Stadium performance on youtube, and John Lennon’s microphone skills really are otherworldly. He couldn’t hear himself yet everything is coming out strong and in tune. I thought it had to be the kind of overdubbing that is the norm in concert films now, but Paul (no slouch!) misses the mic a couple of times, and the error is still in there.
    I’m extremely jealous that you’ve seen Dylan live. I’ve heard that his shows are really hit or miss, but that it’s by design. He has no set-list and will often change the songs radically at that moment (key signature, tempo, vocal stylings, etc.). Tom Petty said that touring as a backup band (with the Heartbreakers) for Dylan was the greatest part of his musical education.
    It’s a very sensible thing for Dylan to do, since so many musicians go crazy playing the same songs over and over again.

    Like

  4. Jon Cogburn Avatar
    Jon Cogburn

    Yeah, what a nice interpretation.
    In one of his interviews with Terry Gross, Tom Waits said that covering somebody else’s song was like putting on a really ill fitting suit of clothes. If it is to have any chance of success, you have to tailor it until it fits you. This was in reference to how amazing it was to hear Johnny Cash’s cover of Waits own “Down there by the Train.”

    Like

  5. om Avatar
    om

    For a stellar example of the “tailoring it until it fits you” approach to covers – in this case specifically applied to a Dylan song (though originally performed by Johnny Cash) – look no further:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZeaBwDmN2E

    Like

Leave a reply to om Cancel reply