Nice article by slate dot com's Rebecca Schuman here,* about the move among university libraries to put more and more printed material in compact shelving where people cannot browse.

Schuman sees these moves as one more instance of administrators and staff turning universities into strip malls with frats:

But there’s one wholly unsentimental reason the stacks are both vital and irreplaceable, and that brings us back to Colby’s decision to replace theirs with a gleaming shrine to the corporate bottom line. As more of the books disappear from college libraries, the people in charge of funding those libraries will be more tempted to co-opt that space for events that bring in revenue, or entice students for the wrong reasons: food courts. Gaming lounges. I expect rock-climbing walls soon. Unless administrators make a protracted effort to preserve the contemplative and studious feeling, that feeling will disappear altogether, and the whatever-brary will become just another Jamba Juice.

Faculty around the country have been trying to fight the strip-mallification of their campuses, but in most cases the administration and staff argue that financial necessity dictates whatever thing it is they are doing to make the campus worse. In most cases the faculty don't have access to what the money is really being spent on, so no way to adjudicate the claims.


At LSU we did win one small battle last year. The Coca-Cola corporation put machines on campus with screens and speakers in them that ran cartoon advertisements 24/7. It was absolutely maddening to be teaching a class or doing work in your office with the incessant noise. Likewise it made it impossible for students to study together in the public spaces with the machines. How could anyone have thought that this was a good idea?

After Faculty Senate got involved they finally agreed to turn them off. Then six months or so later the volumes went back on and we had to complain again. There's still the horrifying uncanny valley Coca Cola polar bear doing his thing on the front of the machine, but at least it's quiet.

I don't think T.S. Eliot had universities in mind when he wrote:

If the lost word is lost, if the spent word is spent
If the unheard, unspoken
Word is unspoken, unheard;
Still is the spoken word, the Word unheard,
The Word without a word, the Word within
The world and for the world;
And the light shone in the darkness and
Against the Word the unstilled world still whirled
About the center of the silent Word.

Oh my people, what have I done unto thee.

Where shall the word be found, where shall the word
Resound? Not here, there is not enough silence.

[Notes:

*Unfortunately, Slate is one of the many webpages using the modern CSS version of frames to do to your screen exactly what Shuman is bemoaning with respect to colleges.**

If you are using firefox go here, and download "Remove it Permanently." Once it's installed you can right click on any offending part of a webpage and scroll down to "remove this permanently" and the part will disappear. This is important because adblock plus doesn't do its full job, for example, with respect to the distracting strobelight/slideshow adds on the both sides of Leiter Reports.***  But "Remove it Permanently" allows you to get rid of them and enjoy the content commercial-free.

It would be cool if there were a meatworld version of these programs that would eat people's car stereos, televisions in public places, and billboards.

**For about a decade every book on HTML design told desingers never, ever, ever to use either moving gifs or frames. I don't know why most web pages have junked this sensible advice over the past year.

***I realize that there may be moral arguments against using tools like "Remove it Permanently." If anyone sends me an e-mail in reference to this post, I won't open it. Please just say it here publicly, anonymously if you want.]

Posted in ,

4 responses to “Is this happening to your college library?”

  1. Andrew Sepielli Avatar
    Andrew Sepielli

    I enjoyed the article, especially this part:
    “These obsolete cloth-bound relics [i.e. books] —the way they smell, their very omnipresence in your field of vision; the way they carry with them centuries of past perusal—are currently the university’s strongest, if not sole, signifier of a contemplative, intellectual space. With the stacks there, a library’s architect creates spaces around the books, thus cementing their omnipresence as near-animate psychological enforcers.”
    I don’t know if this “bibliophenomenology” thesis has been tested empirically; my guess is that if it were, the Slate commenters who are dissing RS for presenting (mere) “feelings” instead of “hard data” would have to eat crow.

    Like

  2. dmf Avatar

    how many faculty are still giving the sorts of assignments that require finding books on shelves? I know that I’m cracking a lot of bindings in my campus visits…

    Like

  3. Alan White Avatar

    All my fiction now is kindled (hmmm… sounds like I’m a book-burner; was the the motivation behind the name??). But damn it I love the bound volume. In grad school back in Knoxville in the 70s I was so comfortable with the stacks of the grad library that I once made a bet with a fellow grad student (while at Sam and Andy’s over beers on the Strip a few blocks away) that he could come up with the most obscure fact or reference that he wanted to know about, and I could come back with something about it in a hour. He wanted to know what the scientific name for a certain kind of yellow lichen found on rocks was. I was back in 55 minutes with three possibilities, and with great pride.
    Little did I know that years later I’d be writing about that on a “blog” and, pausing for about 15 seconds to check, Googled “about 1,810,000 results (0.33 seconds)” of the same thing. While I admire my vastly extended-mind’s capabilities now, I take no pride in that.
    Our own campus library has mostly turned into a lounge with lots of media and not many physical books or periodicals. It does not feel at all like a space that fosters scholarly debate or fevered research. It does have lots of new DVDs, and is a good source of entertainment, and I certainly take advantage of that. I read each new issue of Analysis and sometimes the JP, which are the last print phil journals we get (at my insistence) due to budget cuts.
    Don’t get me wrong: the internet and phi blogs in particular have been an indispensible boon to my later academic career. But I loved being in those old stacks, the card catalogs as familiar friends.

    Like

  4. Sara L. Uckelman Avatar

    I would like to offer one minor correction, which is that “compact-shelving” does not entail “cannot browse”.
    My first university library, Memorial Library at UW-Madison, which I worked at for 6 years and which has unparalleled borrowing and ILL privileges amongst all the libraries I’ve ever been affiliated with, had much of their material in compact shelving, some of which had to be hand cranked to get to the row you wanted, some of which you could push a button and watch the shelves magically unveil. They’ve had the handcranked version since at least the early 80s, when I first visited the library when I was 4-5 and decide then that that was where I wanted to go to college.
    But on the topic of how bad it is for university libraries to move their books to off-site storage is one which I could wax loquaciously on for hours. I still remember with horror the tour we got of the new math/computer science library at the UvA after everyone was moved out to the Science Park, and the building director proudly announcing that he fully believed in 10 years there would be no more books in the library. shudder

    Like

Leave a reply to Sara L. Uckelman Cancel reply