Most readers have probably been following the controversy involving Carolyn Dicey Jennings and Brian Leiter concerning the job placement data post where Carolyn Dicey Jennings compares her analysis of the data she has assembled with the PGR Rank. There have been a number of people reacting to what many perceived as Brian Leiter’s excessively personalized attack of Carolyn Dicey Jennings’s analysis, such as in Daily Nous, and this post by UBC’s Carrie Ichikawa Jenkins on guidelines for academic professional conduct (the latter is not an explicit defense of Carolyn Dicey Jennings, but the message is clear enough, I think). UPDATE: supportive post also at the Feminist Philosophers.

It goes without saying (but I’ll say it anyway) that we, NewAPPS bloggers, fully support Carolyn’s right to post her important analyses of job placement data, and deplore the tone and words adopted by Brian Leiter to voice his objections to her methodology. (This is not the first time that episodes of this kind involving Brian Leiter and junior, untenured colleagues occur; I for one deem such episodes to be inadmissible.)

Posted in , ,

5 responses to “In support of Carolyn Dicey Jennings”

  1. Mauricio Suárez Avatar

    I’m with you on this one. BL assumes there is only one objective ranking or evaluation of these matters. He claims to be responding as an ‘egalitarian’: I’ve heard such response before (not from BL himself) as a reason to obliterate context – it is of course the justification of every repressive dictatorship in history …

    Like

  2. Roberta L. Millstein Avatar

    Although it states so by implication, I want to state explicitly that I support Carolyn Dicey Jennings’s contributions as well as what Catarina Dutilh Novaes says here.

    Like

  3. Eric Winsberg Avatar
    Eric Winsberg

    +1 and also to what Mauricio said.

    Like

Leave a reply to Gordon Hull Cancel reply