By: Samir Chopra

A couple of years ago, after reading Neil Grossexcellent biography of Richard Rorty, I sent him a short note of appreciation, telling him how much I enjoyed his book. Gross wrote back; he was clearly pleasantly surprised to have received my email.

I mention this correspondence because it is an instance of an act that I ought to indulge in far more often but almost never do: writing to let an author–especially an academic one!–know you enjoyed his or her work.

Most academic writing is read by only a few readers: some co-workers in a related field of research, some diligent graduate students, perhaps the odd deluded, excessively indulgent family member. (I am not counting those unfortunate spouses, like mine, who have been pressed into extensive editorial service for unfinished work. These worthies deserve our unstinting praise and are rightfully generously acknowledged in our works.) Many, many academic trees fall in the forest with no one to hear them.

This state of affairs holds for many other kinds of writers, of course. Online, even if we know someone is reading our writing we might not know whether they thought it was any good; we might note the number of hits on our blogs but remain unaware of whether our words resonated with any of our readers. The unfortunate converse is true; comments spaces tell us, loudly and rudely, just how poor our arguments are, how pointless our analysis, how ineffective our polemicizing. There is no shortage of critique, not at all.

It is a commonplace point to direct at academic writers that their work needs to be made relevant and accessible. Fair enough. I think though, that our tribe would greatly benefit from some positive reader feedback when these standards–besides the usual scholarly ones–are met. Academics often write to one another, indicating their interest in a common field of study, the value of their correspondent's writing, and sometimes asking for copies of papers. To these existent epistolary relationships I suggest we add the merely appreciative note: I enjoyed your writing and here is why.

These notes are not mere acts of kindness, a dispensing of charity as it were. They encourage and sustain a useful species of human activity. They create an atmosphere, I think, conducive to scholarship and to further striving toward excellence. They make a writer want more of the same.

I know we're all busy, but the next time you read something you like, see if you can send the writer a little thank-you note. You don't have to do it all the time, but sometimes wouldn't hurt.

Go ahead: reach out and touch someone.

Note: This post was originally published–under the same title–at samirchopra.com. As I noted then,  I was prompted to write it by receiving an email from a doctoral student at Cambridge who had read some of my work and found it useful. As I said then, "The almost absurd pleasure I received on reading his email was a wistful reminder of just how much we crave this sort of contact."

Posted in

4 responses to “Acts Of Kindness: Writing To Writers, Especially Academic Ones”

  1. Sara L. Uckelman Avatar

    This goes for more than just writers, it goes for creators of any kind!

    Like

  2. Owen Flanagan Avatar
    Owen Flanagan

    Yes, this is good thing to do for reasons you say Samir. Sustaining respectful and appreciative practices. I send a few fan emails to authors – philosophers and novelists — every year, and receive a few. But my own favorite unsolicited mails by far are from past students, often the name barely rings a bell, who say that a certain course made a difference, mattered. I was lucky enough recently to be able to track down a great teacher I had in college and tell him how much his teaching meant to me.

    Like

  3. Matthew Kramer Avatar

    If that PhD student asked for some feedback on work of his that is related to yours, you should provide it to him.

    Like

  4. Patrick S. O'Donnell Avatar

    After I completed an early draft of my Islamic Studies bibliography some years ago I circulated it online to scholars whose work I was familiar with and thought highly of in the field. One of those on the receiving end, Oliver Leaman (University of Kentucky, Philosophy: Professor of Philosophy and Zantker Professor of Judaic Studies), subsequently asked me to participate in a couple writing projects (and passed on my name to others!). At the time (and still today), I was a very part-time academic at a community college (who didn’t start teaching until my late 40s), with no real substantive publication record (I had done some work for ABC-CLIO, but it was rather obscure and only available on disc). I can’t convey the depth of my surprise and gratitude for his invitation. Another individual, Professor Ian Richard Netton (Sharjah Professor of Islamic Studies, University of Exeter) asked to use my compilation for his encyclopedia on Islam. This does not quite conform to the model of academic correspondence Samir is recommending, but it nonetheless speaks to the individual “encouragement,” the congenial “atmosphere,” and conduciveness “to scholarship and…further striving toward excellence” he correctly mentions as a likely consequence of unsolicited if not uncommon academic correspondence not constrained by the contours of critique.

    Like

Leave a comment